Home » Archives » "Stryker Losses in Iraq Raise Questions"

Stryker Losses in Iraq Raise Questions

May-13-2007 » Filed Under: 3/2 SBCT , Stryker Vehicle

The Stryker concept has been controversial since its inception, but the vast majority of first-hand reports have been very positive.

By Robert H. Reid and Anne Flaherty, The Associated Press

BAGHDAD — A string of heavy losses from powerful roadside bombs has raised new questions about the vulnerability of the Stryker, the Army's troop-carrying vehicle hailed by supporters as the key to a leaner, more mobile force.

Since the Strykers went into action in violent Diyala province north of Baghdad two months ago, losses of the vehicles have been rising steadily, U.S. officials said.

A single infantry company in Diyala lost five Strykers this month in less than a week, according to soldiers familiar with the losses, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to release the information. The overall number of Strykers lost recently is classified.

In one of the biggest hits, six American soldiers based at Fort Lewis and a journalist were killed when a huge bomb exploded beneath their Stryker on May 6. It was the biggest one-day loss for the battalion in more than two years.

"We went for several months with no losses and were very proud of that," a senior Army official said in Washington, speaking on condition of anonymity because he is not authorized to comment publicly. "Since then, there have been quite a few Stryker losses."

"They are learning how to defeat them," the Army official said of Iraqi insurgents.

[...]

Lt. Col. Bruce Antonio, who commands a Stryker battalion in Diyala, said he and soldiers still have confidence in the Strykers and noted they have survived many bombs, which the military calls improvised explosive device or IEDs.

But Antonio said some insurgents had found "the right mix of explosives and IED positioning to inflict severe damage on the vehicle." He noted that tanks had proved vulnerable, too.

The insurgents also apparently are becoming better at hiding the devices — the IED that killed the six soldiers and the journalist was believed hidden in a sewer line. To add potency, insurgents surrounded the device with cement to channel the blast force up into the tank, according to soldiers familiar with the investigation.

Supporters of the Strykers say all that proves that it's the lethality of bombs in Iraq — not the Strykers themselves — that are the problem: The bombs are now so powerful that even Abrams main battle tanks are vulnerable to some of them.

"I'm not sure if it's any reflection on the (Stryker) but rather on how things are getting worse" in Iraq, according to a senior Democratic congressional staffer who tracks Army programs, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to speak publicly.

Stryker soldiers said that when they were based in Mosul in the north, roadside bombs weren't so big — often, little more than pipe bombs. In Baqouba, the bombs are bigger and buried deeper, making them difficult to detect.

"With what we got hit with the other day, it wouldn't have mattered what we were in," said Spc. John Pearce, speaking of the May 6 bomb. "We were going to take casualties, regardless."

[...]


Comments For "Stryker Losses in Iraq Raise Questions":

The Stryker is obviously a capable vehicle... The problem as stated by those people most familar with it is THE IED(s) and IEP(s) that The Insurgents and other factions are using on it and other military vehicles... The Marine Corps has been using various
configurations of the new MRAP which has a V shaped undercarriage to better deflect the blast from a bomb... So far it has proven effective but then again so had the Strykers... They the enemy have become emboldened and obviously they have personnel who know how to make a bigger, better, and very lethel bombs currently... Maybe the Future Stryker could incorporate the V shape undercarriage as well... dp...

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/images/mrap-image20.jpg

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/mrap.htm

As the parent of a Stryker soldier, I am thankful that my son was in this vehicle on two occassions that it ran over an IED. Just a few weeks ago they hit one and the Stryker was destroyed, but everyone of these brave young men came out alive. Yes, they were injured, but they are alive because of that Stryker.

I am very happy for you TexasStrykerMom, I hope your son is doing well... Please don't think that I am badrapping STRYKERS as I am not... The article spoke of Tanks having been breeched by the IED(S)as well as the Strykers... Overall I think that the safety and Integrity of the vehicle is awesome... Good luck to your son and his squad... dp...

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by a site administrator before your comment will appear. We appreciate your patience.)

Advertisements